Cartridge Dust Collector History
by Gary Berwick, P. Eng.
Quality Air Management
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Excerpts from an article published in various
media.
Click here to view (.pdf)
and print the entire article
Early Development
The cartridge dust
collector was response to the flawed design of the fabric pulse jet
collector...
The cartridge element life was approximately four to eight months but
this was acceptable for the industry in that element change was not difficult...
With the performance realized on the powder spray, acceptance in many industries
followed quickly. The filter elements were a popular size employed as intake
filters on tractor trailer engines.
The initial specifications were as follows: Outer diameter” 13.37 inches
Inner Diameter: 8.25 inches Length: 26 inches Number of pleats: 265 Filter
media area: 185 sq. ft Pleats per inch: 10 Media:: safety media of cellulose
Inner core: usually expanded metal.
 |
Referring to the Figure 1:
-
is the open end cap generally is spun and has a thin coating
of zinc to allow the spinning to be smooth during the spinning
process. It also has a gasket to prevent dust leakage.
- is the outer core of expanded metal rolled and spot welded
so there are no burrs at the joint
- is the media enclosed between the inner and outer cores
- is the inner core, this is generally an expanded metal cylinder
- is the closed end cap. The cone built into the end cap spinning
was to make room for the wing nut and spring washer with integral
gasket.
- is the adhesive to bind the media and cores to the end caps.
|
Notes:
-
... forces developed during the pulse cleaning process gave the gaskets
a permanent set which shortened the filter element life dramatically.
-
... Many times the cleaning forces would break the bond between the
lower end cap and the media. ...causing premature failures...
Cartridge Collector Engineering Disaster
...erroneous conclusions that have dogged the industry for over 25 years:
That cartridge collectors can only operate at filter ratios of 2:1 or 2
fpm The assumption was that they could increase the capacity of this cartridge
collector by squeezing more pleats in the cartridge...
The flaw in this reasoning is there are two factors which determine the
filtering capacity of a pulse jet collector. The square foot of the media
that are cleanable and the volume and pressure characteristics developed
by the cleaning jet. It can only clean continuously on line when the volume
is at least three times the filtering volume for each cartridge and the
pressure developed by the jet is at least three times the operating pressure
drop. The offline cleaning characteristics are not considered in this chapter.
This applies to all pulse jet collectors regardless of the shape of the
filter elements.
Other limitations of early designs

Referring to the above figures.
On the left side we see that the jet grows at an angle ... until it is
stopped ... As it enters the cavity inside a filter element it forms a compression
wave... The action cleans the element evenly...
...early designs the element had a truncated cone built into the closed
end cap... On many dusts this would partially damage the cake... some dust
would leak into the clean air side ... which led to premature filter element
replacement...
...if the pulse pipe was too low, the jet would strike the media below
the opening in the filter element. The cleaning action above this intersection
had limited effectiveness... because of this incorrect height, the added
media contributed little to the filter’s performance, but did raise the
cost of constructing and operating the filters.
Effect of Excess Filter Media and Pressure actuated pulse Controls
... once a bridge forms in the valley of the pleat, it renders the media
below the bridge un-cleanable by on line cleaning.
If a cleaning system is actuated by a pressure control, the setting must
be determined by experimentation since it is virtually impossible to predict
the best pressure setting before the collector is installed. If it is set
at a higher pressure this will affect operating pressure, frequency of cleaning
(air consumption) and dust penetration through the filter. Typically a collector
pressure switch is set at 3 ½ w.c. when the proper setting might be 2 “
w.c. Below are typical operating parameters at the correct and incorrect
settings for a typical operation venting a material handling operation:
Operating at Correct setting for 4,000 CFM system with 3 grains per
cubic foot load:
-
Pressure Drop 2 inch w.c
-
Air Consumption at 85 psig 1.5 SCFM
-
Dust Penetration 0.00004grains/cuft.
-
Cartridge life 18 months
Operating at Incorrect setting for4,000 CFM system with 3 grains per
cu. ft. load:
-
Pressure drop 3.5 inch water column
-
Air consumption at 85psig 4.5 SCFM
-
Dust Penetration 0.00012 grains/cu.ft.
-
Cartridge life 6 months.
Notice that operating power is 1.32 higher, air consumption
and dust emissions are increased 3 times, cartridge life is only 1/3.
Improvements in Cartridge Filter Design
Adhesives
The encapsulating compounds were replaced by adhesives. Epoxies and various
thermo-setting adhesives were supplied. This resulted in a stronger stiffer
cartridge. Cartridges were able to be constructed without the expanded outer
core. To keep the pleats from inverting during the cleaning process, plastic
bands or even strings were applied with great success. These stronger and
more open cartridges opened up new applications for cartridge collectors.
Media Changes
To go along with the changes in adhesives stronger cellulose media was developed.
They were reinforced with polyester and other fibers. This increased the
tensile strength by three or four times and allowed the introduction of
more powerful cleaning systems to increase flow per filter element. Another
important development was incorporation of pleat spacers, by upsetting the
tips of the pleats. This solved a problem in constructing cartridges by
eliminating wide variations in pleat spacing. A section of pleats that were
too narrow would bridge too easily.
Seals
In the quest to prevent any leakage from the dirty to the clean side of
the cartridge, resilient seals were added. The new seals could maintain
an even pressure on the sealing surfaces. In order to maintain a good seal
the pressure must remain within a narrow range of pressure. They can be
tightened so much that sealing compounds will go beyond their plastic limit
and produce uneven pressure and actually leak through the joint. The natural
tendency for many maintenance people is to over tighten gaskets and seals.
Some gaskets are designed to be squeezed beyond their elastic limit and
flow along the joint. This is similar to the gaskets applied in gasoline
engines. .However the valve cover gasket is really an elastic seal. In cartridge
mounting systems, the gaskets would need so much pressure that the cartridge
would be damaged. For this reason elastic seals must be applied. Stops are
often built into the seals themselves. Refer to the diagram below
L M A resilient seal, labelled L is placed between the sealing service
presumably round, and at 120 degree intervals the seal is slit and a ball
bearing, labelled M, is dropped into the slot. This maintains sufficient
sealing pressure but does not allow over compression of the seal. Other
stops can be incorporated into the mounting system.
Un-cleaned media considerations
The area of filter media that can be cleaned depends on the reverse air
volume and pressure of the reverse air jet. If we consider different orifices
and valves and assuming a permeability of 18 -20 CFM at 0.5 inches of pressure
drop for a sq. ft of the base media, the area of media cleaned is:
-
¼ “orifice
7-10 sq. ft.
-
3/8 “orifice 15-20
sq.ft.
-
7/16” orifice 22-26 sq. ft.
-
½ inch orifice 28-37 sq. ft.
-
¾ inch valve 75 to 78 sq.ft
-
1 inch valve 210 to 220 sq. ft.
If we consider a typical tandem design with two cartridges, each being
cleaned by a single ¾ inch valve. Only about 80 square feet of media are
cleaned. We find that the media can hold 0.1 to 0.3 lbs of mineral dust
if it is not cleaned. We can compute the weight of dust on the un-cleaned
media.
450 sq. ft. total less 80 sq ft. cleaned by pulse jet = 370 sq. ft.
370 sq. ft. x (0.1 to 0.3 lb.) per sq. ft. = 37 to 110 lb per 2 cartridge
tandem cleaning sets.
On some of the later designs the mounting bolts on the cartridge support
tripods had to be reinforced to prevent mounting failures.
Cartridge Construction Improvements
Some other innovations to improve cartridge construction were the following.
-
Many new designs included a flat bottom on the closed
end cap.
-
Some designs incorporated a flat disc above the truncated
cone
-
Spun bond and other medias were introduced to counter
the tendency of cellulose medias to expand and shrink with changes in
humidity. Other cartridges were supplied with pleated medias even woven
or felted media and were quite successful. With these new constructions
pleated elements with wide pleat spacing operated at filter ratios of
over 10.
Flexible Media pleated filter elements One limitation of some
spun bond and felted medias was that they would have poor operation if the
pleats were too narrow or lacked mechanical support of the media itself.
Support Media squeezed so it touches Initial final squeezed shape The
support can be a laminate that is stiff but a very open media. This allows
the use of virtually any media in pleated construction..
Conclusion
The users and designers of dust collectors have the possibility of virtually
unlimited filter element
life at negligible dust penetration. If the seals are intact and no
dust penetration occurs to the clean side, cartridge filters can be restored
to ‘as new’ condition.
|