Cartridge Dust Collector Behavior, Range of Inlet Conditionsby: June 2006 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Filter cartridge dust collectors, although similar dust collection systems to reverse jet pulse fabric collectors have some peculiar operating characteristics listed below. These are all related to the shape and construction of the filter element:
MECHANICS OF STEADY STATE CLEANINGFirst it would be beneficial to review the steady state operation of a fabric pulse collector with cylindrical bags. (Fabric pulse jet collectors with envelope bags have sufficiently similar characteristics so they will not be considered separately.) Refer to Figure 1. The conventional designs have orifices and so-called venturies, which are actually pneumatic ejectors in the mouth of each bag. This combination develops a flow in the ejector, which is three to five times the filter-flow.
The main failure mode of a reverse fabric collector is that during cleaning the dust from a row of bags while cleaning is driven into the adjoining rows of bags that are in the Filtering mode. Despite the fact that a failed bag usually has a lot of dust on the outside, the high pressure drop and the dust on the outside is due to the fabric filter media being plugged because the dust was driven through the cake and became embedded in the media on the clean side by subsequent cleaning cycles. The filter cartridge dust collector corrects this main failure mode of a reverse jet fabric collector. Since the reverse cleaning air is always at a higher pressure than the air on the dirty side of the filter media, the air and dust will be propelled away from a filter/cake surface at an angle perpendicular to this surface. Referring to Figure 2A, you will note that in a cylindrical element the dust is propelled into adjoining filter bags, which are under vacuum. The dust at this high velocity is aided by the vacuum to penetrate into the inside of the bag. Once it penetrates, subsequent cleanings drive it into the media, where it stays and progressively blinds the bag. However, in Figure 2B, you will note that perpendicular to the surface of a pleated cartridge filter, the propelled dust and air strikes another surface cake in which all of the openings are filled with high velocity cleaning air. This eliminates the penetration of dust into the collector during the cleaning cycle.
FILTER CARTRIDGE COLLECTOR CLEANING MECHANICSAlthough the basic systems for cleaning cartridge elements are similar, there are some very important differences that relate to the pleated media configuration. For purposes of illustration, consider the process of cake formation. Area of filter/filter-cake that is cleaned is (in either cylindrical bags or cartridge elements) variable and depends on the following:
CAKE FORMATION When the filter element is first installed (either cartridge or fabric, the porosity is usually so high that the jet will continue to grow on the dirty side as if the element were not present. As the cake begins to form the permeability reduces to a point where the resistance across the cake becomes high enough that the jet will stop expanding outside the filter element and the cleaning cycle will begin (Figure 3). When the cake first forms it is very porous. The porosity (permeability) will determine how much of the cake is cleaned. The velocity of cleaning air through the openings will increase as the cake becomes dense and offers more resistance. Increasing the reverse flow volume will clean more of the filter cake area. If none of the cake is plugged:
Where P is Permeability in cfm/sq.ft. at 0.5 in. w.g., A is area in sq.ft., and B is a constant.
Where F is flow in cfm, A is the area of the filter cloth in sq.ft., and C is a constant. This reduces to an equation; The process of cleaning the filter element reduces the porosity of the filter and also the dust collection system efficiency. It is important to reduce cleaning frequency to a point where the filter cake will result in optimum efficiency. This point is where the maximum of cake is cleaned by the reverse air jet. CARTRIDGE TEST DATA The range of frequency of cleaning settings is quite wide, but in general we want to clean at the lowest practical pressure drop and at the minimum cleaning frequency. Table 1 indicates some results of tests on a cartridge collector where the inlet loads were extremely low (less than 1.25 % of anticipated design inlet load) and the cleaning frequency set at cleaning the collector at the design load.
At the proper cleaning frequencies, which were once every four to eight hours, for this range of inlet loads, the collection efficiencies were over 99.5%. CARTRIDGE TEST INFORMATION In an effort to quantify cartridge filter performance over a range of inlet conditions, a controlled test was setup. The test equipment consisted of a QAM-400 collector with eight small cartridge elements, a continuous feeder to introduce a variable amount of dust, fan, instrumentation, and controls. The cartridges were standard construction with 8 pleats per inch and constructed with epoxy seals and resilient gaskets. The standard rating of the collector is 2,000 CFM, which is at a filter ratio of 4.3:1 (high by industry standards, but conservative for advanced technology collectors). Test dust was talc with a size distribution of 50% less than 8 microns. Variables to be introduced were:
CARTRIDGE OPERATING SUGGESTIONS Setting cleaning frequency for a cartridge dust collector with narrow pleats is very complex. A widely used procedure is to initiate the cleaning by a pressure switch. This, in theory, promises an ideal solution to get maximum efficiency of collection with minimum cleaning energy. However, the typical scenario for a cartridge collector is:
A better way of setting the cleaning cycle with a pressure switch is as folIows: - Determine the pressure drop with the cartridges clean and rated flow in the collector.
Without a pressure switch:
CARTRIDGE RATING The collector should be selected at a rated flow which is between 15% and 30% of the flow in the reverse jet. De-rating dust collectors is normally an effort to remedy a poor design. For example, if we put a collector with thirty cartridges on a process, which is the proper rating, and get three months cartridge life, it is likely that if we double the collector size we may get six months cartridge life. However, there will be an average ten cartridges per month which require changes in either case. By purchasing the larger collector, the user has doubled his investment and has taken up valuable floor space. A better approach might be to supply a better cartridge andcleaning system. CARTRIDGE FAILURE MODES BRIDGING OF PLEATS In a cartridge dust collector the pressure drop across an effective cake can vary from 0.15" to 3.5" water gauge.
Often, cartridge dust collectors, especially those with cellulose media, are specified by air to cloth ratios. This is a flawed specification criterion. Under no circumstances should the pleats be closer together than lO pleats/inch based on the inside diameter of the cartridge. Putting pleats closer will result in excessive bridging, high pressure drop, and premature cartridge failure. OTHER FAILURE MODES The most serious design deficiency in any reverse jet collector is the lack of prevention of dust penetration from the clean side to the dirty side. The inherent nature of the pleated media is such that dust is not driven into adjoining filter elements during cleaning. This leaves effective permanent joint seals and gasket joint design as important elements of cartridge design (Figure 4).
Permanent Joint Seals are defined as joints where the dust or gas barrier is permanent and is produced by an inflexible barrier that is formed on mating surfaces and held by either pressure or adhesion of the sealant material. The cartridge is constructed by submerging pleats into an adhesive/potting mixture. There are two requirements for this mixture. It must wet the media surfaces to form a dust tight joint and have sufficient strength to withstand the stress reversals put on the joint by the cleaning jets. During cleaning, 25 to 60 pounds of force are exerted by the jet on the bottom (closed) end cap. Many times thermosetting plastisols are applied. After a cartridge has failed because of dust penetration, the cartridge can be placed on a hot plate to loosen the media and the joint examined. If the joint was not strong enough, paths of dust from the dirty to the clean side can be detected along the closed end plate. Gasketed Joints are defined as joints where the dust proof seal is due to the gasket providing pressure on the joint. These are formed by applying resilient seals to one or both of the surfaces. For cartridge collectors one of the surfaces is resilient and the other is cemented to the cartridge. Many seals lose their resiliency. If the resiliency is lost, dust will leak through the joint. When a cartridge is removed from a collector the seal should return to its original thickness within three or four minutes after its removal. If it does not, it is almost certain that dust has leaked into the inside of the cartridge and has either caused or contributed the cartridge failure. One of the most effective sealing techniques is accomplished by a retained seal with the dimensions selected so that the precise sealing pressure is maintained. If gaskets are over-stressed they will become hard at the sealing surface and will leak enough to cause early failure of the filter element. RECOVERY EQUIPMENT FOR BRIDGED CARTRIDGE ELEMENTSCartridges can often be recovered after they have failed. This is true for both cellulose and fabric pleated filter elements. Let us look at the two modes of failure that were previously discussed.
SUMMARYFilter cartridge dust collectors have some very pronounced advantages and some unique operational features. By understanding these features, the specifier and operator can expect more efficient filtration, long cartridge element life, as well as operating at lower pressure drops with a minimum of air consumption. When designing new dust collection systems, advanced technology high-ratio designs should be favored. |
|||||||||||
| Full Article on Cartridge Collector Behavior in PDF format. | |||||||||||









